Home arrow Reviews arrow Racism
Main Menu
Home
About MWS
MWS Staff
Articles
Poems
Stories
Reviews
Members
Submit Content
One Ummah Network
Submission Guidelines
Content List
Login
Online Members
No Users Online
New users
Racism PDF Print E-mail

By , on 16-07-2002 01:28

Views : 1192    

Favoured : 52

Published in : , Articles


By Shameeyaa neo waMolefe

Contributing objective views to topics such as racism it can be a challenging political/cultural task for a contributor’s neutrality to sustain in form of positivism and negativism. The angle, in which the inputs emerge, can influence the context of the message. For instance, if emotional and personal opinions are involved, readers can perceive the contents of the contribution as subjective. The slanted outcomes can technically sustain to the contribution and depict supremacy of influence the contributor tends to achieve. A contributor can at times be tugged within a skewed analysis while this can have an affect to the coherent critical criticism of issues originality, on the other hand, it can be perceived as ‘fractional’ contribution.
Literally, racism is the theory where human abilities are determined by race and/or (derogatory) the belief that some races are superior to others. Contrasting prior definitions within the racial ‘notion’, the meaning it conveys, transgress the ‘ethnical morality’ of ‘undivided’ races. The ‘division’ of people which emerged in the imperialistic eras i.e. tribalism, colonialism, and apartheid eras, had encouraged inequalization of classes to become a conventional norm i.e. proletarians and bourgeois in society and exploited the morals of communal lineage. The bondage upshot it has earmarked is it therapy? But can workshop-conference psychoanalysis and remedy heal brutal pieces of the past?

Racism is a challenging monster to the world, especially the pre-colonized/democratic countries. If focus of the matter outface politics, then we need to redefine and converge on how clinched words had affected and predisposed ordinary people to organize organizations such as Black Consciousness Movement, African National Congress, Communist Party, Skinheads (Grey -t-shirts), Ku Klux Klan, Black Panther Party, and etc which combated for ‘freedom and justice’. Weren’t these organizations fighting for revolution? If so, why is revolution presently seen as inappropriate? Who damn said the struggle is over?

If indeed freedom and quality is a reality why there has never in history of USA any black president? While you might agree/disagree yet justify? The socio-current ‘struggle’ the world and this country is fighting for, can be ineffective if the power it entails is filled with nepotism and corruption yet shielding against communism ideologies as bullet to shoot those who belief in it, yet make it unworkable? You see I personally belief that if Karl Marx (founder of Communism) was alive perhaps communism system would have worked.

Although racism is ‘real’ and people have become statistical occurrence to it. For me, this is the monologue puppet drama directed by British, Uncle Sam, and his capitalistic presidents misusing individuals’ emotions as machine. I therefore refuse to be a supplier to what the Human Rights Commission, New World Order, and Imperialist had intended to have in their conferences/summits/ outcome programmes, while enduring with their ‘mission of distracting the world’. Some conventionalists and Uncle Tom’s can review the prior statement as a naïve and subjective response to the essential socio-therapy of the victims that have suffered brutally in hands and minds of oppressors. Beneath the grain of imprinted and spoken words there’s so much unveiled and unknown. Only loopholes in this regard can be of help.

Don’t get me wrong, neither misunderstand me to a conspiracy theorist, but being a cynic character I am tired of this game played to us. I am allowing my critical contribution to be influenced by the emotional notions which imbalances the context in this contribution, I don’t care. I am tired and of the edge to drift with my ‘solution. I often wonder if past and present revolutionaries, activists, rebel,s etc are/were true to what they fought for?

Am I a homeless word in the hopeless thought?

Last update : 16-07-2002 01:28

   
Quote this article in website
Favoured
Print
Send to friend
Related articles
Save this to del.icio.us

Users' Comments  RSS feed comment
 

Average user rating

   (0 vote)

 


Add your comment
Only registered users can comment an article. Please login or register.

No comment posted



mXcomment 1.0.4 © 2007-2008 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
 
< Prev   Next >


Latest Content
Polls
What is your favorite type of writing?
 
Statistics
Members: 1066
News: 665
Web Links: 0
Feeds
Use this XML feed to aggregate our content